ASRM

MEMBERS-ONLY LOGIN

 
About ASRM
Home Page
ASRM Annual Meeting
ASRM Office of Public
Affairs
ASRM Board
Find ASRM on
Contact Us
Update ASRM
Join ASRM!
Renew Membership
Licensure/Certification
Policy
Donate to ASRM
Search the Site
Site Awards
ASRM Store ASRM Store 
 
For All Users
Topic Index
Headline News
ASRM Literature
Links to Prof. Orgs.
ASRM on your Desktop
Downloading PDF Files
 
Selected ASRM Publications:
  * Fertility and Sterility
  * Sex, Repro & Meno
  * JARG
  * Menopausal Medicine
  * ASRM News 
  * Practice Guidelines
  * Ethics Reports
  * Classification Forms
  * ASRM Bulletins
  
For Patients
Home
FAQ - Infertility
FAQ - Psychology
Patient Fact Sheets
Patient Info Booklets
Protect Your Fertility
Infertility Insurance Laws
Selecting an IVF/GIFT Program
ART Success Rates
Adoption Links
Find a Doctor
 
For Professionals
Home
Upcoming Meetings
Members-Only Area
Membership (Services, Benefits, Sign-Up)
Corporate Members
Research Network Nook
Email Discussion Lists
Specialty Societies
Career Center
Research Grants
ASRM Announcements
FDA Announcements
NIH Announcements
Coding Q & A
 
For the Media
Home
Press Releases
Legally Speaking
Washington Wire
ASRM Office of Public Affairs
ASRM Specialty Societies
Home
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
Society for Male Reproduction and Urology
Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility
Society of Reproductive Surgeons
Androgen Excess Special Interest Group
Association of Reproductive Managers
Chinese Special Interest Group
Contraception Special Interest Group
Endometriosis Special Interest Group
Environment and Reproduction Special Interest Group
Fertility Preservation Special Interest Group
Fibroid Special Interest Group
Genetic Counseling Special Interest Group
Imaging in Reproductive Medicine Special Interest Group
Mental Health Professional Group
Menopause Special Interest Group
Nurses Professional Group
Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Special Interest Group
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Special Interest Group
Reproductive Biologists Professional Group
Reproductive Immunology Special Interest Group
Reproductive Laboratory Technologists Professional Group
Sexuality Special Interest Group
Women's Council

  

 

  

Sign me up for RBPG! for the Reproductive Biologists Professional Group.  Membership in the RBPG is free for ASRM Members.  If you'd like to become a member of the RBPG, tell us.

The Reproductive Biologists Professional Group (RBPG) promotes study and supports research in reproductive biology while providing a forum for scientists and clinicians to exchange ideas. 

Officers:

  • Chair - Mitchel C. Schiewe, Ph.D

  • Vice-Chair – Barry Behr, Ph.D

  • Secretary - Sangita K. Jindal, Ph.D

  • Program Chair - Amy Sparks, Ph.D

  • Nominating Committee Chair - Diane Wright, Ph.D 

  • Website Coordinator - Fred Miller, M.S. 

  • SART Representative - David Wininger, Ph.D. 

  • Bylaws Committee Chair - Michael Vernon, Ph.D. 

  • Abstract Review Committee Chair – Barry Behr, PhD.

Of Interest to Members

Some items below are in Adobe® Acrobat® PDF format. Please click here for downloading information. 

Message from the Chair

In the midst of a financial free fall, in hope for change with a newly elected President and among the local Proposition 8 protestors in the streets of San Francisco, the 2008 ASRM Conference was a “smash success”. With record attendance, up 20%, it was a good year for reproductive biologists, highlighted by a newly elected colleague on the ASRM Board, Secretary Catherine Racowsky, and two active pioneers of reproductive biology as keynote speakers: Drs. Alan Trounson and David E. Wildt. Cheers to Alan, leaving the good life down under for a golden life in sunny California. Alan did his best Santa Claus impression by offering multi-million dollar gifts of stem cell research funding, promoting collaborative clinical/industry applications. Meanwhile, my ex-mentor Dave, captivated the audience with his discussion of basic ART success with “Lions, Tigers and Pandas, Oh My! The Importance of Genetic Management and ART in Species Preservation”.

Other highlights of SF, besides the fabulous weather and restaurants, are specifically discussed below.

Reproductive biologists ended the 2008 strong, but prepare for a rocky ride ahead; at least that is the forecast. Our nation faces a financial crisis unseen by our generation. In the past, ART has been a relatively recession proof industry, as having a family is given a high priority in a patient’s life. However, these are different times, so it is safe to assume we will all be tightening our belts a bit in the months ahead. We hope everyone finds a way to keep their costs down, pregnancies up and patients and medical director’s happy, so we can all afford to gather again in Atlanta. See you all next Fall!

Mitchel C. Schiewe, PhD, HCLD

“Hot Air” from the RBPG Chairs - Current and Past:

Thanks to the recent fiasco in Southern California, birth of octuplets by IVF, our nation is up-in-arms bringing unwanted criticism to the field of reproductive medicine. Although physicians and embryologists in the USA are in favor of elective, self-regulation suggested by SART guidelines, as opposed to mandatory regulations on the number of embryos transferred per age group enforced in European countries, it appears we must now implement stricter policies! Do the state and federal legislative bodies have to mandate us? Perhaps instead, should they establish a medical malpractice policy in terms of how many embryos can be transferred based on a patients age and history? Or, perhaps they should regulate the type of unethical/potentially false advertising practices that are utilized to lure infertility patients into their practice? The Sulemann octuplet story has stimulated the public and our profession to address many key aspects of infertility patient management from psychiatric screening of the patient (i.e., state of mind?) to the accuracy in assessing recent fertility potential, to the role of an embryologist. One doctor in Southern California, during an interview, actually blamed the embryologist for thawing and transferring sex embryos into a 33 year old with four previous IVF full-term pregnancies (six babies). Seriously???

The RBPG, on the whole, takes exception to the belief that the embryologist actually has the final word in the number of embryos that are ultimately placed into a transfer catheter. With few exceptions, embryologists in the United States work under the guidance of physicians, who are paid by the patients to make responsible decisions that hopefully conform to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART). At best, it is the job of embryologist to inform the patient and physician as to cycle outcomes, more specifically the stage and quality of embryo development, and recommend a number of embryos to transfer that conforms to SART guidelines (e.g., one or two embryos for patients ≤34 year old or derived from donor eggs), while minimizing a patients’ risk of having high order multiple births (≥3 babies /pregnancy). The latter especially applies to a patient who is morally, ethically and/or religiously opposed to selective reduction procedures during pregnancy. Most clinics have an informed worksheet or consent that patient’s sign at the time of embryo transfer that indicates the number of embryos that will be transferred, and a justification by the physician, if any, why recommended guidelines may have been exceeded. In doing so, such an informed embryo transfer consent should clearly indicate the SART guidelines by age groups and the developmental stage of the embryo and an acknowledgement by the patient that they are aware of, and understand, the guidelines. 

In short, it is unlikely that an embryologist, or societal pressures alone, can ultimately control the unethical and irresponsible actions of a physician struggling to achieve acceptable pregnancy rates in his/her clinic. The RBPG and its sister organization, the Reproductive Laboratory Technologists Professional Group, will stand united with SART and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine to work toward more rigorous compliance of the SART guidelines. This watchdog approach should include, but not necessarily limited to, revoking membership from those who do not follow guidelines. In the meantime, United States embryologists should take a more active role in limiting the number of embryos transferred, especially when physicians or patients suggest transferring more than four embryos. 

Mitchel C. Schiewe, PhD (2008, 2009)
Karen Elkind-Hirsch, PhD (2007)
William Boone, PhD (2006)


Sign me up for RBPG! for the Reproductive Biologists Professional Group.  Membership in the RBPG is free for ASRM Members.  If you'd like to become a member of the RBPG, tell us.

RBPG Project Coordinator
American Society for Reproductive Medicine
1209 Montgomery Highway
Birmingham, Alabama 35216-2809
(205) 978-5000
Email: asrm@asrm.org
 


By accessing and using the ASRM Web Site, you agree to be bound by 
the ASRM Web Site Terms and Conditions of Use.  

View the ASRM Non Discrimination Policy

Copyright 1996-2009 ASRM, All Rights Reserved
American Society for Reproductive Medicine


Listed on Infertility Resources
Developed and hosted by Internet Health Resources