Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL)

Strategy for coding for a patient with RPL - codes compiled by the ASRM Coding Committee. Many aspects of the evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) remain controversial. This document is limited to the most common and well-established etiologies and treatments and should not be considered an exhaustive list. In some cases, individual insurance companies produce “Clinical Policy Bulletins” that outline which tests or treatments they have designated as “medically necessary” vs. experimental/investigational, and may serve as helpful guidance in regard to insurance coverage decisions.

Login now to view the answer to this Coding question. 

If you are not an ASRM member and would like to be, click here.

Quick Links

Learn More About ASRM

Thousands of doctors, nurses, and other professionals in the field of reproductive medicine are advancing their careers with the latest news, continuing education, discounts, and networking opportunities. 

Ready to Join?  |  Renew