ASRM

MEMBERS-ONLY LOGIN

 
About ASRM
Home Page
ASRM Annual Meeting
ASRM Office of Public Affairs
ASRM Board
Contact Us
Update ASRM
Join ASRM!
Renew Membership
Disciplinary Policy
Donate to ASRM
Search the Site
Site Awards
ASRM Store ASRM Store 
 
For All Users
Topic Index
Headline News
ASRM Literature
Links to Prof. Orgs.
ASRM on your Desktop
Downloading PDF Files
 
Selected ASRM Publications:
  * Fertility and Sterility
  * Sex, Repro & Meno
  * Menopausal Medicine
  * ASRM News 
  * Practice Guidelines
  * Ethics Reports
  * Classification Forms
  * ASRM Bulletins
  
For Patients
Home
FAQ - Infertility
FAQ - Psychology
Patient Fact Sheets
Patient Info Booklets
Protect Your Fertility
Infertility Insurance Laws
Selecting an IVF/GIFT Program
ART Success Rates
Adoption Links
Find a Doctor
 
For Professionals
Home
Upcoming Meetings
Members-Only Area
Membership (Services, Benefits, Sign-Up)
Corporate Members
CME Available Here
Research Network Nook
Email Discussion Lists
Specialty Societies
Career Center
Research Grants
ASRM Announcements
FDA Announcements
NIH Announcements
Coding Q & A
 
For the Media
Home
Press Releases
Legally Speaking
Washington Wire
ASRM Office of Public Affairs
ASRM Specialty Societies
Home
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
Society for Male Reproduction and Urology
Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility
Society of Reproductive Surgeons
Androgen Excess Special Interest Group
Association of Reproductive Managers
Chinese Special Interest Group
Contraception Special Interest Group
Endometriosis Special Interest Group
Environment and Reproduction Special Interest Group
Fertility Preservation Special Interest Group
Genetic Counseling Special Interest Group
Imaging in Reproductive Medicine Special Interest Group
Mental Health Professional Group
Menopause Special Interest Group
Nurses Professional Group
Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Special Interest Group
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Special Interest Group
Reproductive Biologists Professional Group
Reproductive Immunology Special Interest Group
Reproductive Laboratory Technologists Professional Group
Sexuality Special Interest Group
Women's Council

  

 

 
Washington Wire

From ASRM News Winter 2008 Vol 41 No 4:

Congress Gets Busy Just Before Holidays
Just as millions of Americans wait until the last minute to do their holiday shopping, their government also excels at procrastination. Rushing to finish their business before the Christmas recess, Congress waited until late December to finish several important items.

  • First they passed a Medicare bill that replaced a 10% cut in physician payment scheduled for January 1, 2008 with a 0.5% increase. While this is good news, without further action, the respite will be brief. The cut is now scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2008. The American Medical Association which has been leading the fight on this issue is already hard at work seeking a permanent fix. This bill also extended the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, without an increase, through March 2009.

  • Congress and the President also managed to cut a deal on federal spending for the 2008 Fiscal Year, which actually started in October.

  • NIH got an appropriation of $29.229 billion, an increase of $329 million or 1.1% over FY 2007. CDC got an increase of $110 million for a total of $6.38 billion.

  • The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) would get $335 million, an increase of $16 million. This includes $30 million on clinical effectiveness research, double the 2007 figure.

  • Federal family planning through the Title X program received a $22 million increase. The current abstinence-only education program is extended through June 30, 2008 and is funded at the FY 2007 level of $113 million. 

FDA Seeks Enforcement of So-Called “Bioidentical” Compounds
In early January, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it had sent letters warning seven pharmacy operations that the claims they make about the safety and effectiveness of their so-called "bioidentical hormone replacement therapy," or "BHRT" products are unsupported by medical evidence, and are considered false and misleading by the agency. FDA is concerned that unfounded claims like these mislead women and health care professionals.

The pharmacy operations improperly claim that their drugs, which contain hormones such as estrogen, progesterone, and estriol (which is not a component of an FDA approved drug and has not been proven safe and effective for any use) are superior to FDA-approved menopausal hormone therapy drugs and prevent or treat serious diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, stroke, and various forms of cancer.

FDA is concerned that the claims for safety, effectiveness, and superiority that these pharmacy operations tout are misleading patients, as well as doctors and other health care professionals. Compounded drugs are not reviewed by the FDA for safety and effectiveness, and FDA encourages patients to use FDA-approved drugs whenever possible. The warning letters state that the pharmacy operations violate federal law by making false and misleading claims about their hormone therapy drugs. 

FDA also responded yesterday to a citizen petition from Wyeth, Madison, NJ, requesting regulatory action against compounding pharmacy operations that produce compounded "BHRT" drugs. Other stakeholders, including ASRM and other health care providers and consumer groups, have also raised concerns about "BHRT" drugs.

“Behind-the-Counter” Drugs?
ASRM testified in a FDA public hearing on creating a new category of “behind the counter” drugs. We expressed our concern that such a category could easily be misused to make reproductive drugs more difficult for patients to access. Their access could be jeopardized either by federal policies made for non-medical reasons, such as those for emergency contraception, or by the refusal of individual pharmacists to make products available.

Stem Cells

  • The pre-Thanksgiving media was dominated by the news that scientists had been able to reprogram adult cells into embryonic stem cell-like tissues, and induced those tissues into becoming different specialized tissues themselves. Should others be able to replicate this work, then the need to use eggs or embryos for regenerative medicine would be dramatically reduced. The week prior, a team from Oregon announced they had used SCNT in non-human primates to generate ES cell lines. In January, researchers from Advanced Cell Technology announced they had successfully generated stem cell lines. All of these developments could impact the policy debate about stem cell research.

  • In June 2007, the House passed S. 5, the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act, and sent it to the President. Unfortunately, the President vetoed the bill, and it is generally thought that the votes are not there to override the veto. S. 5 would have lifted the President’s restrictions on funding embryonic stem cell research and allowed federally funded scientists to work with stem cell lines derived from IVF-created embryos which are no longer needed clinically by patients. 

Colorado Ballot Measure for Embryo Rights
In Colorado, proponents recently won a case allowing them to move forward with a ballot measure to grant full constitutional rights in the state to fertilized eggs, embryos, and fetuses. If they can get enough signatures, the measure will be on the ballot in November. There are some reports that similar efforts will be mounted in as many as half a dozen other states. These measures raise very serious issues for reproductive medicine-from contraception to ART. ASRM is paying close attention to these developments and will
oppose them strongly.

 

Return to Washington Wire Archive

 

 

 

 


By accessing and using the ASRM Web Site, you agree to be bound by 
the ASRM Web Site Terms and Conditions of Use.  

View the ASRM Non Discrimination Policy

Copyright 1996-2008 ASRM, All Rights Reserved
American Society for Reproductive Medicine


Listed on Infertility Resources
Developed and hosted by Internet Health Resources