ASRM

MEMBERS-ONLY LOGIN

 
About ASRM
Home Page
ASRM Annual Meeting
ASRM Office of Public Affairs
ASRM Board
Contact Us
Update ASRM
Join ASRM!
Renew Membership
Disciplinary Policy
Donate to ASRM
Search the Site
Site Awards
ASRM Store ASRM Store 
 
For All Users
Topic Index
Headline News
ASRM Literature
Links to Prof. Orgs.
ASRM on your Desktop
Downloading PDF Files
 
Selected ASRM Publications:
  * Fertility and Sterility
  * Sex, Repro & Meno
  * Menopausal Medicine
  * ASRM News 
  * Practice Guidelines
  * Ethics Reports
  * Classification Forms
  * ASRM Bulletins
  
For Patients
Home
FAQ - Infertility
FAQ - Psychology
Patient Fact Sheets
Patient Info Booklets
Protect Your Fertility
Infertility Insurance Laws
Selecting an IVF/GIFT Program
ART Success Rates
Adoption Links
Find a Doctor
 
For Professionals
Home
Upcoming Meetings
Members-Only Area
Membership (Services, Benefits, Sign-Up)
Corporate Members
CME Available Here
Research Network Nook
Email Discussion Lists
Specialty Societies
Career Center
Research Grants
ASRM Announcements
FDA Announcements
NIH Announcements
Coding Q & A
 
For the Media
Home
Press Releases
Legally Speaking
Washington Wire
ASRM Office of Public Affairs
ASRM Specialty Societies
Home
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
Society for Male Reproduction and Urology
Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility
Society of Reproductive Surgeons
Androgen Excess Special Interest Group
Association of Reproductive Managers
Chinese Special Interest Group
Contraception Special Interest Group
Endometriosis Special Interest Group
Environment and Reproduction Special Interest Group
Fertility Preservation Special Interest Group
Genetic Counseling Special Interest Group
Imaging in Reproductive Medicine Special Interest Group
Mental Health Professional Group
Menopause Special Interest Group
Nurses Professional Group
Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Special Interest Group
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Special Interest Group
Reproductive Biologists Professional Group
Reproductive Immunology Special Interest Group
Reproductive Laboratory Technologists Professional Group
Sexuality Special Interest Group
Women's Council

  

 

 
Washington Wire

From ASRM News Winter 2007 Vol 40 No 4:

What to Expect from the 110th Congress

  • With Democratic control of Congress for the first time since 1994, the landscape for reproductive medicine looks dramatically different in many ways. Ultimately though, the impact of this on the concerns of reproductive medicine will likely be less dramatic than we might hope for.

  • Clearly, the biggest difference will be that we no longer have to fear Congressional efforts to ban or significantly impede ART-related techniques, or some methods of contraception. It seems clear that one of the factors in the November elections was a frustration with extreme ideological driven policies. While there is not a "pro-choice" majority in the Congress, there will be little interest in any moves to impede reproductive options. Instead, we will likely see efforts to increase federal support for contraceptive delivery, research and education. The ASRM will be an active advocate for what is being touted as the "prevention agenda."

  • On the research funding side, things will get worse before they get better; and they probably won't get that much better. While the Democrats will be more favorably disposed towards domestic spending generally, there will be terrific competition for very limited dollars. All fields of science, but particularly the reproductive sciences, should expect to benefit from less ideologically driven funding decisions. 

  • The 109th Congress never completed most of the funding measures for FY 2007. Rather than go through a complete budget process, the Democratic leadership has opted to pursue a continuing resolution. Included in this measure (which at press time had passed the House, but not the Senate) was an increase of approximately $600 million for the National Institutes of Health; that included $69 million in funds for the National Children's Study. 

  • The landscape has changed for general health care policy as well. The pharmaceutical industry is already facing pressure on several fronts. The House has passed a bill to allow HHS to negotiate with industry on the costs of drugs in the Medicare prescription drug program. There are several proposals for increasing coverage for the uninsured, including the one made by the President in his State of the Union address. We are a long way from seeing a consensus emerge, but clearly health care is back in the policy mix.

  • As part of the Democratic leadership's "first 100 hours" agenda, they passed the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act (HR 3) which would lift the Bush restrictions on federal funding for stem cell research. With 253 votes, the pro-stem cell vote increased by about 15 from the 109th Congress. Senate action is expected by spring. A veto is still expected, but there have been increasing efforts at some sort of compromise by a number of GOP Senators. Should the bill pass, be vetoed and that veto be sustained, there will likely be efforts to find other means to lift the president's restrictions on stem cell funding.

 

Return to Washington Wire Archive

 

 

 

 


By accessing and using the ASRM Web Site, you agree to be bound by 
the ASRM Web Site Terms and Conditions of Use.  

View the ASRM Non Discrimination Policy

Copyright 1996-2008 ASRM, All Rights Reserved
American Society for Reproductive Medicine


Listed on Infertility Resources
Developed and hosted by Internet Health Resources