ASRM

MEMBERS-ONLY LOGIN

 
About ASRM
Home Page
ASRM Annual Meeting
ASRM Office of Public Affairs
ASRM Board
Contact Us
Update ASRM
Join ASRM!
Renew Membership
Disciplinary Policy
Donate to ASRM
Search the Site
Site Awards
ASRM Store ASRM Store 
 
For All Users
Topic Index
Headline News
ASRM Literature
Links to Prof. Orgs.
ASRM on your Desktop
Downloading PDF Files
 
Selected ASRM Publications:
  * Fertility and Sterility
  * Sex, Repro & Meno
  * Menopausal Medicine
  * ASRM News 
  * Practice Guidelines
  * Ethics Reports
  * Classification Forms
  * ASRM Bulletins
  
For Patients
Home
FAQ - Infertility
FAQ - Psychology
Patient Fact Sheets
Patient Info Booklets
Protect Your Fertility
Infertility Insurance Laws
Selecting an IVF/GIFT Program
ART Success Rates
Adoption Links
Find a Doctor
 
For Professionals
Home
Upcoming Meetings
Members-Only Area
Membership (Services, Benefits, Sign-Up)
Corporate Members
CME Available Here
Research Network Nook
Email Discussion Lists
Specialty Societies
Career Center
Research Grants
ASRM Announcements
FDA Announcements
NIH Announcements
Coding Q & A
 
For the Media
Home
Press Releases
Legally Speaking
Washington Wire
ASRM Office of Public Affairs
ASRM Specialty Societies
Home
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
Society for Male Reproduction and Urology
Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility
Society of Reproductive Surgeons
Androgen Excess Special Interest Group
Association of Reproductive Managers
Chinese Special Interest Group
Contraception Special Interest Group
Endometriosis Special Interest Group
Environment and Reproduction Special Interest Group
Fertility Preservation Special Interest Group
Genetic Counseling Special Interest Group
Imaging in Reproductive Medicine Special Interest Group
Mental Health Professional Group
Menopause Special Interest Group
Nurses Professional Group
Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Special Interest Group
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Special Interest Group
Reproductive Biologists Professional Group
Reproductive Immunology Special Interest Group
Reproductive Laboratory Technologists Professional Group
Sexuality Special Interest Group
Women's Council

  

 

 
Washington Wire

From ASRM News Fall 2006 Vol 40 No 3:

FDA Moves to Make Emergency Contraception Available Without a Prescription
In August, the FDA surprised many observers and approved making emergency contraception available to women over 18 without a prescription. The move came nearly two years after the FDA’s reproductive health advisory committee had recommended the change be made. The decision was announced just days before Acting FDA commissioner Andrew C. von Eschenbach, M.D was facing a confirmation vote in the Senate. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA) and Hillary Clinton (D-NY) had announced they would put a "hold" on his confirmation until a decision on emergency contraception had been made.

  • As pointed out by the reproductive health advisory committee, there are no data to suggest that the product poses any greater risk for women under 18. So the decision to restrict it to 18-year-olds and older still rankled many as being a political, rather than a scientific, decision. 

  • ASRM President Joseph S. Sanfilippo M.D., M.B.A., issued a press statement saying in part, "ASRM has, from the beginning, advocated for the over-the-counter availability of Plan B, and has taken every opportunity to comment to FDA in writing and through its representatives." The ASRM statement also emphasized the importance of using all contraceptives correctly. The statement was picked up in nearly 100 newspapers across the country.

The National Academies’ Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Advisory Committee Seeks Public Comments; Will Meet in November
The National Academies’ Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Advisory Committee is set to meet again at a public symposium November 7-8, 2006, at the National Academies in Washington, DC.

  • The Advisory Committee reviews scientific developments and ethical, legal and policy issues related to human embryonic stem cell research. It also addresses the need for revisions to the Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research and prepares periodic updates to the Guidelines as needed.

  • In July, I attended the first symposium and spoke about the need for fair compensation for egg donors to SCNT research -- including reimbursement for time lost from work and compensation for pain and physical effort. This is an essential point on which the Guidelines need to be changed; they presently do not allow for donor compensation beyond direct expenses of the donation.

  • Public comments can be made at the symposium or submitted online a: http://dels.nas.edu/bls/stemcells/input.php.

  • ASRM members are encouraged to submit their own comments. Let the Advisory Committee know the ways in which you think the Guidelines can be improved or clarified; new scientific, ethical, or legal information that requires the Guidelines to be updated; or about problems your clinic or institution has experienced in relation to embryonic stem cell research (egg or embryo donation). 

  • More information, and the Guidelines themselves, can be found at the National Academies’ Stem Cell Home page: http://dels.nas.edu/bls/stemcells.

ASRM Advocates for Reform of the Medicare Physician Payment Formula
In early September, ASRM worked with the AMA and other medical societies to rally members of the House of Representatives to address the Medicare physician payment cut before Congress adjourns in October. If Congress fails to act, the Medicare sustainable growth rate (SGR) will cut physician payments by 5.1% effective January 1, 2007, with cuts totaling nearly 40% through 2015.

  • ASRM alerted its members to call their Representatives to urge them to sign a letter to House leadership from Nancy Johnson of Connecticut and Ben Cardin of Maryland. 

  • The Johnson-Cardin letter states that "[t]he average 2006 Medicare rates for paying physicians are about the same as they were in 2001. If the 2007 cut is imposed, then the aggregate payment rates since 2001 will have fallen 20 percent below the government’s conservative measure of inflation for medical practice costs. These projected cuts will destabilize the Medicare program and put at risk all patients’ access to health care."

  • The SGR is a flawed formula that fails to take into account annual increases in practice costs. Other Medicare providers, such as hospitals, are not subject to the SGR. Payments to these other providers continue to rise: under current law, hospitals will see an increase of more than 3% a year, and payments to Medicare Advantage plans are expected to increase by 7.1% in 2007.

  • As the United States’ senior population continues to grow, and utilization of Medicare benefits increases, unrealistic payment cuts to physicians will result in reduced access to care. The situation needs to be rectified with a stable and fair payment law for physician services. 

 

Return to Washington Wire Archive

 

 

 

 


By accessing and using the ASRM Web Site, you agree to be bound by 
the ASRM Web Site Terms and Conditions of Use.  

View the ASRM Non Discrimination Policy

Copyright 1996-2008 ASRM, All Rights Reserved
American Society for Reproductive Medicine


Listed on Infertility Resources
Developed and hosted by Internet Health Resources